The news archive of the German Society for Philosophy of Science (GWP).

Large Language Models for the History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science (Workshop)

April 2-4, 2025, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany

Organized by: Gerd Graßhoff, Arno Simons, Adrian Wüthrich, and Michael Zichert

Summary

We invite contributions to our workshop on using large language models (LLMs) in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science (HPSS). The workshop will focus on exploring use cases and proposals for how, and to what extent, LLMs might help overcome long-standing challenges in studies of how science works. The event will take place from April 2–4, 2025, at Technische Universität Berlin, Germany.1 Attendance (online and on site) will be free and open to the public but registration will be required. To contribute a talk, please submit abstracts of 300–600 words by December 31, 2024, to arno.simons@tu-berlin.de.

Workshop topics

Computational approaches to the history of science are in the process of establishing themselves among the standard repertoire of tools in the field and we have seen remarkable successes in their application already. Subfields of sociology of science have focused, since long, on quantitative methods such as bibliometrics and scientometrics. More recently, philosophy of science has experienced a shift towards allowing more empirical approaches including large-scale algorithmic analyses of scientific or methodological concepts. Computational tools can not only help reduce the workload in traditional research in these fields but, more importantly, also open up new avenues which to explore would otherwise be hopeless.

Analyses of co-occurrences and word frequencies as well as more advanced techniques such as topic modeling have helped go beyond identifying only structural features of scientific activities and began scratching the surface of semantics. However, a deeper understanding of scientific concepts, the structure of scientific arguments, and the process of knowledge transformation and spread have remained formidable challenges for computational approaches in the mentioned fields.

With the advent of LLMs this might change now. Natural language processing and machine learning have made a spectacular leap forward in their attempt to capture and analyze meaning and grammatical structures of texts. This promises that LLMs can help HPSS researchers meet the aforementioned challenges. However—besides general issues such as opacity, bias and interpretability—the use of LLMs for HPSS is likely to face unique obstacles arising from the specialized nature of scientific language as well as the specific perspectives and objectives of HPSS. It will be the main goal of this workshop to see how, given these obstacles, the most recent advances in LLM development can help overcome long-standing challenges in HPSS.

Accordingly, the workshop will address two key themes, with the goal of synthesizing them over the course of the event. On one hand, contributions should articulate the specific needs and desiderata of HPSS researchers—what they hope LLMs can achieve for their work. On the other hand, the current state of LLM development should be critically examined to determine to what extent these research goals are becoming attainable. Ideally, contributions will address both these objectives, though submissions focused on only one of them are also welcome.

We particularly encourage contributions that focus on:

  • Use cases that demonstrate how LLMs can help resolve current issues in HPSS
  • Examples of how LLMs allow researchers to ask and answer new types of questions in HPSS
  • How new types of sources and data, made analyzable through LLMs, contribute to novel insights in HPSS research

We look for contributions that help resolve questions like these:

  • How can LLMs help gain new perspectives on long-standing problems in HPSS such as determining the relevant contexts of knowledge claims, the dynamics of scientific controversies, problems of incommensurability, and generalizability of case studies?
  • How can LLMs handle the specialized language of scientific texts, including technical jargon, citations, and mathematical formulas?
  • How can LLMs bridge the gap between qualitative and computational methods and help overcome their limitations?
  • How can LLMs be integrated into existing theoretical and methodological frameworks in HPSS, or how should these frameworks evolve to accommodate LLM-based analysis?
  • How can we evaluate the validity of results generated by LLMs, given their opacity?
  • How can LLMs account for the temporal development of scientific language and knowledge over time?

Format and practical information

The workshop will take place from April 2-4, 2025 at Technische Universität Berlin. The program will consist of an invited keynote and contributed short talks (15+10 min) as well as additional sessions for discussions. Attendance (online and on site) will be free and open to the public but registration will be required. Information on this will follow closer to the date.

To contribute a talk, please send an abstract of your planned contribution of 300-600 words by e-mail to arno.simons@tu-berlin.de by December 31, 2024. We encourage every contributor to present on site and to participate in the whole workshop program. In exceptional cases, we will offer the possibility to present remotely.

Participation of underrepresented groups is particularly welcome, and we may be able to offer financial support to cover travel costs for contributing authors in exceptional cases. Please indicate in your submission if you would like to apply for financial support.

We plan to publish the slides, videos, and abstracts on a suitable platform. We also plan to write a report on the workshop and on the perspectives resulting from it.


  1. The workshop is funded by the European Union through the project “Network Epistemology in Practice (NEPI)” (ERC Consolidator Grant, Project No. 101044932). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the organizers only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

The SOCRATES group – Social Credibility and Trustworthiness of Expert Knowledge and Science-Based Information – invites applications for senior fellowships and postdoctoral fellowships (2-12 months) at Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.

SOCRATES provides a forum for interdisciplinary as well as inner-disciplinary exchange on scientific credibility and trust in science. We offer fellowships for scholars from across the globe and disciplines with a demonstrable research output in the topics explored at SOCRATES, and a PhD in philosophy, sociology, communication & media studies, or a related discipline. Successful candidates will conduct their own research, will participate in the Centre’s activities in Hannover, and will receive a monthly stipend of 2,700 – 3,000 euros (plus travel and accommodation expenses). Start date: Any time between October 2025 and September 2026. Please note that we do not offer PhD positions.

For more information and the application form, go to the SOCRATES website. Deadline: 15 November 2024.

In connection with the centenary of the Vienna Circle and the upcoming 75th anniversary of the
Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science, we are organizing a conference titled Philosophy
of Science: Past, Present and Future. This conference will take place on October 17-19, 2024,
and will be held at the University of Minnesota.

The conference will consist of three sessions. First, a group of HOPOS scholars will reflect on
the institutional and intellectual history of philosophy of science, exploring how research centers,
departments, ideas and movements have shaped the discipline as we know it today. Next, a
group of contemporary philosophers of science (established researchers, journal editors, society
presidents, and research center directors) will reflect on the current status of the profession
through a series of papers and round table conversations. Finally, a group of junior scholars will
offer their vision of what philosophy of science could or should look like in the decades to come.
Each session type will include contributed papers, with a larger number in the Future session
type with graduate students or scholars who obtained their PhD.

Speakers
Aaron McCright, Adam Smith, Aja Watkins, Alan Richardson, Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda, Angela
Potochnik, Anke Bueter, Anna Alexandrova, Bennett McNulty, Bryan Roberts, Holly Andersen,
Carl Craver, Carole Lee, Chad Gonnerman, Edouard Machery, Fons Dewulf, George Reisch,
Gregor Bös, Haixin Dang, Hannes Leitgeb, Heather Douglas, Helene Scott-Fordsmand, James
Weatherall, Janet Stemwedel, Joel Isaac, Kabir Singh Bakshi, Kathleen Creel, Kathryn
Plaisance, Kristina Rolin, Liam Kofi Bright, Lydia Patton, Matthew Lund, Mahmoud Jalloh,
Michela Massimi, Miguel Ohnesorge, Ohad Reiss-Sorokin, Olesya Bondarenko, Sabina
Leonelli, Sara Doody, Stephan Hartmann, Stéphanie Ruphy, Thomas Uebel, Wendy Parker

Scientific Committee
Bas van Fraassen, Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Philip Kitcher, Helen Longino, Deborah Mayo,
Sandra Mitchell, Friedrich Stadler, Alison Wylie

Organizers
Alan Love (MCPS, University of Minnesota)
Sander Verhaegh (TiLPS, Tilburg University)

Location

The meeting will be held at the McNamara Alumni Center in the Thomas H. Swain Room and
surrounding spaces. It is located on the East Bank campus of the University of Minnesota.

Registration
Everyone is cordially invited. If you would like to attend, please use our online form to register
before October 10. Full program available here.

More information
This conference is funded by the College of Liberal Arts, UMN and the Minnesota Center for
Philosophy of Science. Questions about the conference can be directed at Alan Love
(aclove[at]umn.edu) and Sander Verhaegh (a.a.verhaegh[at]tilburguniversity.edu). Conference
website: https://cla.umn.edu/mcps/research-programs/conferences-and-workshops.

https://service.tu-dortmund.de/documents/18/2120797/Vorlage_Ref.Nr.46-244_Layout+Dez3_WR_1.pdf/523f9ca6-70e2-ed79-e1ea-77c27e335d47

The Faculty of Human Sciences and Theology, in cooperation with the 
Faculty of Physics, is offering a post-doctoral research position for a 
project duration of three years at the earliest possible date. Payment 
according to public service’s wage agreement TV-L E13. An employment in 
or a reduction to part-time is generally possible.

The position is part of the DFG project “Data, Theories and Scientific 
Explanation: The Example of Astroparticle Physics”, which addresses 
epistemological questions of the theory dependence of data and 
scientific explanation at the intersection of philosophy and physics. 
Astroparticle physics investigates cosmic rays using telescope systems 
that monitor large volumes of data and register subatomic messenger 
particles from the universe. Innovative machine learning methods are 
used for data analysis at TU Dortmund University, and the project 
focuses on the probabilistic character and epistemic significance of 
these methods.

We offer:

The opportunity to conduct cutting-edge research at the interface of 
physics and philosophy; connections to the LAMARR Institute for Machine 
Learning and Artificial Intelligence, the SFB 1491 “Cosmic Interacting 
Matters”, and the DFG project UDNN (Prof. Florian J. Boge); many 
opportunities for further qualification as well as the opportunity to 
present your research at national and international conferences.

Tasks: The role of machine learning in astroparticle physics, particle 
physics, and radio astronomy will be investigated in studies to clarify 
how machine learning mediates between measurement results and theory and 
how this has to be interpreted from an epistemological point of view. 
The work will be integrated into the research group of Prof. Wolfgang 
Rhode (Physics) and carried out in cooperation with Prof. Brigitte 
Falkenburg (Philosophy).

Your qualification:

– highly motivated PostDoc with an excellent PhD in philosophy 
(philosophy of science or history and philosophy of science) or in 
physics (astroparticle, particle or astrophysics)

– He/she should be familiar with data analysis in high energy physics or 
astroparticle physics to be able to compare their methods, and have the 
relevant philosophical knowledge required for epistemological comparison

– Previous experience in interdisciplinary work, familiarity with the 
philosophical debates on the epistemic significance of computer 
simulations and machine learning as well as related publications in 
peer-reviewed international journals are welcome.

– we expect the ability to combine teamwork with independent research 
and good communication and organizational skills.

We promote diversity and equal opportunities. Convince us with your 
personality and expertise. Applications from women will be given 
preferential treatment in accordance with legal regulations. Please note 
that applications from suitable severely disabled persons are welcome.

Please send your application with the usual documents (CV, grades, 
motivation, reference) by 10.10.024, quoting the reference number 
w46-24, to:

Prof. Dr. Dr. Wolfgang Rhode
Dortmund University of Technology
Faculty of Physics
Otto-Hahn-Str. 4a
44227 Dortmund

If you have any questions, please contact:
brigitte.falkenburg@tu-dortmund.de
wolfgang.rhode@tu-dortmund.de

The submission for the Fifth International Conference of the German Society for Philosophy of Science (GWP.2025) is open. Proposals for individual papers or symposia can be submitted electronically via https://gwp2025.sciencesconf.org/.

The conference will be hosted by the FAU Kompetenzzentrum für interdisziplinäre Wissenschaftsreflexion (ZIWIS) at FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg and co-hosted by its Institut für Philosophie from 24th until 26th of March 2025. Contributed papers are invited from all fields of philosophy of science as well as from the history of science, science & technology studies (STS), and other related disciplines.

We welcome proposals for individual papers (30 min plus 10 min discussion) or symposia (3 speakers in a 2-hour session). Graduate students are especially encouraged to submit proposals for either individual papers or symposia. On the conference website at https://www.wissphil.de/gwp2025/ you will find a full CFP and all detailed information on the submission process (including formatting guidelines of proposals for symposia) and, closer to the time, on how to register for the conference.

Please note that each person can only present one paper at the GWP.2025 (whether individual or as part of a symposium; co-authorship of papers presented by others is possible). The recommended conference language is English, but contributions in German will also be considered. 

The extended deadline for all submissions is: September 15, 2024

Expected notification of acceptance by the beginning of November 2024. 

Local Organizing Committee (LOC): Michael Jungert (chair), Sabine Dika, Gerhard Ernst, Katrin Götz-Votteler, Simone Hespers, Jon Leefmann, Erasmus Mayr, Josephine Musil-Gutsch, Vanina Rodriguez-Bauer, Anna Schneider, Sebastian Schuol

Program Committee: Axel Gelfert (GWP President), Gerhard Ernst, Vera Hoffmann-Kolss, Michael Jungert, Jon Leefmann, Erasmus Mayr, Josephine Musil-Gutsch, Sebastian Schuol

Please feel free to contact the organizers if you need any further information: ziwis-conference@fau.de.

Topical Collection in the European Journal for Philosophy of Science

Guest Editors: Enno Fischer (Institute of Philosophy, TU Dresden) & Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda (Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, KU Leuven)

Open for submissions: 1 November 2024 – 30 April 2025

Originally going back to Larry Laudan’s (1977) distinction between the ‘context of acceptance’ and the ‘context of pursuit,’ the concept of pursuitworthiness has garnered considerable attention in the philosophy of science in recent years. For instance, philosophers have explored the different stances on pursuitworthiness adopted by towering figures in the field such as Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend (e.g., Šešelja & Straßer, 2013; Shaw, 2022), and have advanced and debated manifold epistemic criteria on what makes a scientific idea or proposal worthy of being undertaken (e.g., Achinstein, 1993; Šešelja et al., 2012; Šešelja & Straßer, 2014; Shan, 2020; DiMarco & Khalifa, 2019, Fleisher, 2022). The significance of this enlarging body of scholarship notwithstanding, philosophical reflections on the pursuitworthiness of scientific research have almost exclusively focused on theories, (and to a lesser extent on) models and research programmes in toto (e.g., Lichtenstein, 2021; Cabrera, 2021; Haueis & Kästner, 2022; Han, 2023; Fischer, 2024a; Wolf & Duerr, 2024), whereas systematic and comprehensive reflection on the pursuitworthiness of experiments is hitherto lacking (but see Laymon & Franklin, 2022; DiMarco & Khalifa, 2022; Fischer, 2024b). This is an important and somewhat surprising lacuna because it is often the experiments, out of the many elements that make up scientific practice, that require large amounts of funding, deliberations, and long-term planning.

For the philosophy of science, delving into the pursuitworthiness of experiments is also particularly pressing given that since the years of Laudan’s initial proposal, the philosophy of experiment has re-established itself as a central element in the canon of the discipline (see, e.g., Hacking, 1983, 1988; Gooding et al., 1989; Steinle, 2002; Radder, 2003; Weber, 2009; Feest & Steinle, 2016; Bokulich & Bocchi, 2024). Philosophers of experiment have foregrounded many important considerations (e.g., material cultures of experimentation and the role of instruments, the importance of tacit knowledge in experimental manipulations, and how experiments affect concept, model and theory formation), but they have not inquired in detail about the context of pursuit of experiments in different scientific settings. In this sense, the topic of the pursuitworthiness of experiments lies at the interface between two salient, overarching problem spaces in the philosophy of science.

The aim of this topical collection is to put discussions of the pursuitworthiness of experiments on the agenda of general philosophy of science and the philosophies of the special sciences. It will bring together contributions addressing experiments across the sciences, from the physical and chemical sciences to the life, biomedical, and cognitive sciences, as well as the social sciences. For more details on possible topics and questions, references and instructions for submission see the full call for papers:

https://tu-dresden.de/gsw/phil/iphil/phisci/ressourcen/dateien/CfP_EJPS.pdf

GWP.2025

Fifth International Conference of the German Society for Philosophy of Science

Call for Papers – Call for Symposia

ZIWIS, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)

Erlangen, Germany

March 24-26, 2025

Submission Deadline: September 1, 2024

Acceptance Notification: November 2024

Keynote lectures will be given by:

Kevin Elliott (Michigan State)

Roman Frigg (London)

Andreas Hüttemann (Köln)

Lina Jansson (Nottingham)

Sabina Leonelli (München)

Naomi Oreskes (Harvard)

The German Society for Philosophy of Science (Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsphilosophie – GWP) was founded in September 2011 with the aim to better integrate the community of philosophers of science and academics interested in philosophy of science in Germany and thereby to promote the field at a local and international level. The GWP organizes an international conference every three years. Our fifth conference will be hosted by the FAU Kompetenzzentrum für interdisziplinäre Wissenschaftsreflexion (ZIWIS) at FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg and co-hosted by its Institut für Philosophie from 24th until 26th of March 2025. The ZIWIS (www.ziwis.fau.de) pursues the goal of understanding philosophy of science in an application-oriented way and linking it with other areas of science studies, which is characterized by the concept of “Wissenschaftsreflexion” (“reflection on science”).

Contributed papers are invited from all fields of philosophy of science as well as from the history of science, science & technology studies (STS), and other related disciplines. Contributed papers will be clustered into parallel sessions focusing on particular topics or special sciences.

We welcome proposals for individual papers (30 min plus 10 min discussion) or symposia (3 speakers in a 2-hour session). Graduate students are especially encouraged to submit proposals for either individual papers or symposia. All proposals will be submitted electronically via the conference website at https://www.wissphil.de/gwp2025/ where you will also find all detailed information on the submission process (including formatting guidelines of proposals) and, closer to the time, on how to register for the conference.

Please note that each person can only present one paper at the GWP.2025 (whether individual or as part of a symposium; co-authorship of papers presented by others is possible). The recommended conference language is English, but contributions in German will also be considered.

The deadline for all submissions is: September 1, 2024

Expected notification of acceptance by the beginning of November 2024. 

Local Organizing Committee (LOC): Michael Jungert (chair), Sabine Dika, Gerhard Ernst, Katrin Götz-Votteler, Simone Hespers, Jon Leefmann, Erasmus Mayr, Josephine Musil-Gutsch, Vanina Rodriguez-Bauer, Anna Schneider, Sebastian Schuol

Program Committee: Axel Gelfert (GWP President), Gerhard Ernst, Vera Hoffmann-Kolss, Michael Jungert, Jon Leefmann, Erasmus Mayr, Josephine Musil-Gutsch, Sebastian Schuol

The Center for Philosophy, Science, and Policy (CPSP) at the Marche Polytechnic University invites applications for the Master in “Statistics, Data Intelligence, and the Foundations of the Sciences”.

The Master aims to fill a gap in the Data Science and STEM fields by integrating theoretical tools and empirical methods for an educated approach to data analysis, scientific experimentation, use of simulation tools in scientific inference and forecasting, as well as evaluation of evidence for policy purposes. The uniqueness of the Master’s training offer is linked to three aspects:

1. The integration of courses on advanced data analysis and inferential techniques (machine learning, deep learning, AI), as well as tutorials on some of the most widespread data processing tools (Python, STATA, R, Matlab), with courses dedicated to the foundations of the scientific method, epistemology, and philosophy of science. A particular focus is directed towards the theoretical foundations of the scientific methods.

2. Emphasis on the distinction between pure “truth-conducive” aims and strategic goals at play in scientific practice. Formal analysis of strategic interactions in the scientific ecosystem as well as political and economic analysis of science in society. Identification of the various scientific sub-systems (scientific, governmental, socio-economic institutions and society at large) and their joint work within broader socio-economic structures.

3. Policy-making and the role of scientific evidence in decision-making, both personal and collective, with particular attention to the debate on the so-called “Evidence-based policy” and the related political and civil implications.

The Master is aimed at students and scholars from both the human sciences and STEM disciplines, but also at professionals who want to enrich their skills in the field of data analysis, science epistemology, and evidence-based policy. 

The master is fully in English and takes one year to complete, particularly from September 2024 to June 2025. The application is now open and possible till June 27, 2024. The program is available at: https://cpsp.univpm.it/master-sdifs

For inquiries about and assistance in the application procedure and other details please contact: michalpsikorski@gmail.com

Liebe GWP-Mitglieder,

im Namen des Vorstandes freue ich mich, Ihnen die Daten der nächsten GWP-Konferenz bekanntgeben zu können: Die GWP.2025 wird vom 24. bis 26. März 2025 in Erlangen an der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), unter Federführung des ZIWIS – FAU Kompetenzzentrum für interdisziplinäre Wissenschaftsreflexion, stattfinden. Ein ausführlicher Call for Papers wird derzeit vorbereitet und voraussichtlich im März zirkuliert werden.

Wir freuen uns darauf, möglichst viele von Ihnen im nächsten Jahr auf der GWP.2025 in Erlangen begrüßen zu können!

Mit herzlichen Grüßen

Axel Gelfert
GWP-Präsident

In connection with the centenary of the Vienna Circle and the upcoming 75th anniversary of the Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science, we are organizing a conference titled Philosophy of Science: Past, Present and Future. This conference will take place on October 17-19, 2024, and will be held at the University of Minnesota. 

The conference will consist of three sessions. First, a group of HOPOS scholars will reflect on the institutional history of philosophy of science, exploring how journals, research centers, societies, departments, and funding agencies have shaped the discipline as we know it today. Next, a group of contemporary philosophers of science (prominent researchers, journal editors, society presidents, and research center directors) will reflect on the current status of the profession through a series of papers and round table conversations. Finally, a group of promising junior scholars will offer their vision of what philosophy of science could or should look like in the decades to come.

Confirmed Speakers 

Anna Alexandrova (University of Cambridge), Holly Andersen (Simon Fraser University), Liam Kofi Bright (London School of Economics), Carl Craver (Washington University-St. Louis), Kathleen Creel (Northeastern University), Fons Dewulf (TiLPS, Tilburg University), Heather Douglas (Michigan State University), Stephan Hartmann (MCMP, LMU Munich), Joel Isaac (University of Chicago), Carole Lee (University of Washington), Hannes Leitgeb (MCMP, LMU Munich), Sabina Leonelli (University of Exeter), Edouard Machery (University of Pittsburgh), Michela Massimi (University of Edinburgh), Bennett McNulty (University of Minnesota), Wendy Parker (Virgina Tech), Lydia Patton (Virginia Tech), Angela Potochnik (University of Cincinatti), George Reisch (Independent scholar), Alan Richardson (University of British Columbia), Stéphanie Ruphy (ENS-University of Paris), Bryan Roberts (London School of Economics), Janet Stemwedel (San José State University), Thomas Uebel (University of Manchester), James Weatherall (UC Irvine) 

Scientific Committee 

Bas van Fraassen (Princeton University), Paul Hoyningen-Huene (Leibniz University Hannover), Philip Kitcher (Columbia University), Helen Longino (Stanford University), Deborah Mayo (Virginia Tech), Sandra Mitchell (University of Pittsburgh), Friedrich Stadler (University of Vienna), Alison Wylie (University of British Columbia) 

Organizers 

Alan Love (MCPS, University of Minnesota), Sander Verhaegh (TiLPS, Tilburg University) 

Submission guidelines 

We invite philosophers of science and HOPOS scholars to submit proposals for poster presentations in conjunction with the conference theme. Submissions on all topics related to the past, present, or future of philosophy of science broadly construed are welcome. Please submit abstracts of 500 words (maximum) suitable for blind review to mcps@umn.edu and indicate whether you would like to present your poster in the ‘Past’, the ‘Present’, or the ‘Future’ section. 

In every section of the conference with invited speakers, a few paper slots will be reserved for contributed abstracts. Please indicate whether you would like your poster proposal to be considered for such a slot. Oral presentations in the ‘Future’ section will be exclusively reserved for junior scholars (graduate students or scholars who obtained their PhD within the last six years). 

A curated subset of the proceedings will be published in the Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science series with contributors revising manuscripts in light of conference feedback and peer review comments. 

Dates and Deadlines 

April 30: Submission deadline 

May 31: Notifications 

October 17-19: Conference 

More information 

This conference is hosted by the Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science in the College of 

Liberal Arts at the University of Minnesota (Twin Cities). Questions about the conference can be 

directed to Alan Love (aclove[at]umn.edu) and Sander Verhaegh (a.a.verhaegh[at]tilburguniversity.edu). 

Website: https://cla.umn.edu/mcps/research-programs/conferences-and-workshops

Invited Speakers: 

Alison Fernandes, Bryan Roberts, Cristian López, Eddy Chen, Jill North, Natalja Deng, and Nina Emery

Abstract:

The problem of the direction of time is a central issue in contemporary philosophy of science. On the one hand, we experience many time-directed phenomena, such as causal relationships and local thermodynamic behavior; on the other hand, our fundamental dynamic laws of nature are time-reversal invariant. The key question regarding the direction of time is therefore: If not in the time-reversal invariant laws, what is the direction of time grounded in? The workshop seeks to elucidate the relationship between the direction of time and our physical world, by addressing questions such as: Is the direction of time an objective feature of our world? Can the direction of time be physically justified? How is it related to the asymmetries we experience?
This International Workshop is organized as an event of the DFG projects “The Direction of Time and The Direction of Causality” and “The Time of Science and the Time of Our Lives”.

Registration:
Participation is free, but limited. To register and receive the Zoom link, please send an email to mvoggena@uni-koeln.de or k.salimkhani@uni-koeln.de with your name and affiliation.

Website: https://philevents.org/event/show/112966

Organizers:
Martin Voggenauer
Kian Salimkhani

Aims:
The international workshop on “Trivalent Suspension, Uncertainty and 
Reasoning with Conditionals” (TSUC) aims to bring together renowned 
researchers from philosophy, logic, formal epistemology, and mathematics 
to discuss the major issues, contemporary methodologies that have arisen 
in the study of suspension, uncertainty, and conditionals. We would like 
to investigate a specific perspective concerning trivalent logic, 
probability and conditionals. Specifically, this workshop intends to 
bring together researchers to introduce and discuss i) major TSUC 
research issues that have arisen in recent years, ii) innovative 
methodologies developed in response to such issues, iii) the connections 
between the three components of TSUC, and iv) major TSUC research 
challenges in its future development. Such research issues include the 
formal models of judgment suspension, indeterminism, uncertainty 
inference, many-valued connectives and consequences, subjective prob- 
ability, conditional probabilities, trivalent conditionals, branching 
time structure, and so forth. We will be able to understand the major 
issues, and research problems and gaps for the future development of TSUC.

Speakers:
Caitlin Canonica (Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany)
John Cantwell (KTH Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, Sweden)
Massimiliano Carrara (Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy)
Mario Günther (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany)
Sven Ove Hansson (KTH Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, Sweden)
Tim Kraft (University of Regensburg, Germany)
Ondrej Majer (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic)
Niki Pfeifer (University of Regensburg, Germany)
Hans Rott (University of Regensburg, Germany)
Giuseppe Sanfilippo (Università degli Studi di Palermo, Italy)
Daniela Schuster (Universität Konstanz, Germany)
Verena Wagner (Universität Konstanz, Germany)
Wei Zhu (University of Regensburg, Germany)

Organisers:
Hans Rott, Niki Pfeifer, Wei Zhu (Department of Philosophy, University 
of Regensburg)

For titles, abstracts, and updates to the program please check out our 
website at

https://go.uni-regensburg.de/tsuc

Call for Registration: “Explainable AI and Society” Lecture Series

The 4th installment of the lecture series “Explainable AI and Society” will take place during the winter semester 2023/2024, online and in person at TU Dortmund.

Modern AI can be used to drive cars, to decide on loans, or to detect cancer. Yet, the inner workings of many AI systems remain hidden – even to experts. Given the crucial role that AI systems play in modern society, this seems unacceptable. But how can we make complex, self-learning systems explainable? What kinds of explanations are we looking for when demanding that AI must be explainable? And which societal, ethical and legal desiderata can actually be satisfied via explainability?

The interdisciplinary, hybrid lecture series presents the latest research on these and related topics and invites exchange with researchers, students, and the interested public.

Lecture Dates

  • 19.10.23, 6.15 p.m. (CEST): Claus Beisbart, University of Bern (philosophy): 
    “Explained – agreed. On the consequences of informed consent on explainability”
  • 16.11.23, 6.15 p.m. (CET): Emmanuel Müller, TU Dortmund (computer science): 
    “Trustworthy Machine Learning”
  • 14.12.23, 6.15 p.m. (CET): Anne Lauber-Rönsberg, TU Dresden (law): 
    “A Legal Perspective on Explainable AI: Why, How Much and For Whom?”
  • 18.01.24, 6.15 p.m. (CET): Gudela Grote, ETH Zurich (psychology): 
    “Organizing AI: How to shape accountable AI development and use” 


Registration

To register, send an e-mail with the title “Registration” to sara.mann@tu-dortmund.de. Include which lecture(s) you would like to attend and whether you will attend online or in person.

For further information visit https://explainable-intelligent.systems/forthcoming-lectures/

The lecture series is organized by the research project “Explainable Intelligent Systems“, funded by the Volkswagen Foundation.

Dear colleagues and students,

please find here some information about the two-year Master program “History, Philosophy and Culture of Science” (HPS+) offered by the Philosophy Department in cooperation with other Departments at Ruhr-University Bochum (RUB): HPS+-info [1]

An important novelty is that from now on a specialization in logic (next to a focus on HPS) is also possible. (The title of the program will show this soon).

If you see opportunities to announce our Master program in your field and / or to draw the attention of suitable students to it, we would be very pleased!
There will be a hybrid info event on Wednesday, July 5, 11:00 AM (CET). Interested students can contact us via our homepage (https://www.hpsplus.org/contact) and will receive a Zoom-link in advance.

Many thanks in advance and kind regards,
The HPS+-Team

[1] Link to HPS+Info: https://www.hpsplus.org/_files/ugd/70ba36_996d5eec22e6406c9bb9726ea9645f1a.pdf

The European Philosophy of Science Association calls for proposals for the venue of EPSA25, its 10th Biennial Conference, to be held in the autumn of 2025. The biennial conference is the main scientific event of the EPSA, typically attracting 200-300 philosophers of science from across the world. It usually comprises 200 contributed and symposia talks, organized in as many as eight different sections, and taking place in five or six parallel sessions. A selection of papers from the conference will be published as a special edition of the European Journal for Philosophy of Science.

The conference is typically hosted by a philosophy of science unit, and its venue must be a recognized European academic or research institution. The event takes place in the autumn over a period of 3-4 days in alternating years to the conference of the Philosophy of Science Association (PSA). Past conferences have taken place in Madrid (2007), Amsterdam (2009), Athens (2011), Helsinki (2013), Düsseldorf (2015), Exeter (2017), Geneva (2019) and Turin (2021). EPSA23 will take place in Belgrade, Serbia.

A Local Organizing Committee (LOC) is set up at the host institution — with a remit to organize the event itself. About one year in advance, the Steering Committee (SC) of the EPSA puts out a call for papers and selects a Programme Committee (PC) comprising distinguished philosophers of science. The LOC, SC, and PC are non-overlapping sets of people, with the exception of the Chairs of the LOC and PC, who may be drawn from the SC.

Proposals (one PDF document) should be submitted to the President of the Association (Prof. Stéphanie Ruphy | email: epsa@philsci.eu) by November 15, 2023 and must include the following:

  • The name of the organizing unit or research institution.
  • The name of the academic or research institute hosting the event.
  • The proposed dates in the autumn of 2025 (expected to be a long weekend between end of August and end of November 2025).
  • The names of the members of the LOC, including Chair(s) and/or Deputy (please note that the members of the LOC have to be EPSA members).
  • The CV of the Chair(s) of the LOC.
  • An estimated budget proposal, including rough estimates for the following expenses: a) building and facilities, b) catering, c) conference registration packs (200 delegates minimum), d)personnel, e) expected financial contribution by the host institution and/or a funding agency.

For more information about our past conferences, click here or contact us at epsa@philsci.eu.

All the best,

The European Philosophy of Science Association.

Ankündigung

Das Netzwerk „Argumentieren in der Schule“ richtet im Rahmen seines Arbeitstreffens einen öffentlichen Workshop mit dem Titel „Ziele und Grenzen des Argumentierens“ aus, der vom 18. bis 20. September 2023 in Düsseldorf stattfindet.

Welche Ziele können und sollen im Argumentieren verfolgt werden? Wo liegen die Grenzen des Argumentierens und wie lässt sich mit ihnen umgehen? Diese und weitere Fragen zu Status, Funktion und Kontexten des Argumentierens sowie ihre Konsequenzen für die Argumentationsdidaktik und die Unterrichtspraxis stehen im Zentrum des Workshops. Angenommen, das Formulieren, Analysieren und Bewerten von Argumenten steht als Kernkompetenz freier und kritischer Bürger*innen zurecht im Zentrum der Bildungsziele von Universitäten und Schulen. Denn schließlich haben diese Kompetenzen einen wesentlichen Anteil an dem im „Dresdener Konsens“ formulierten Ziel der Stärkung einer ganzheitlich verstandenen Urteilskraft. Dennoch, und um so mehr, gilt es zu fragen, wie genau sich das Argumentieren zum Urteilen verhält, welchen Zwecken es dient und wo seine Grenzen liegen.Plakat-u.-Flyer-Düsseldorf-1Herunterladen

Zeit und Ort

Montag, 18. September 2023

  • 15:00 Informelles Zusammenkommen
  • 15.30 Begrüßung
  • 15:45–17:00 David Lanius (Karlsruhe)
    Warum es unmöglich ist, gut zu argumentieren – und was das für Demokratiebildung und den öffentlichen Diskurs bedeutet
  • 17:00 Pause
  • 17:30–18:45 Kirsten Meyer (Berlin)
    Förderung argumentativer Kompetenzen und moralische Bildung

Dienstag, 19. September 2023

  • 09:30–10:45 Peggy H. Breitenstein (Jena)
    „It is largely undisputed …”? Wie umgehen mit dem aktuellen Blasphemismus gegenüber argumentativen Diskursen?
  • 10:45 Pause
  • 11:15–12:30 Thomas Grundmann (Köln)
    Soziale Erkenntnis-Rollen und zulässige Argument-Typen
  • 12:30 Mittagspause
  • 14:00–15:15 Monika Platz (München)
    Zur (epistemisch) asymmetrischen Beziehung zwischen Lehrkraft und Schüler*in: Positive und negative Auswirkungen auf das Argumentieren in der Schule
  • 15:15 Pause
  • 15:45–17:00 Kinga Golus (Bielefeld)
    Philosophie inklusiv lehren – Können Menschen mit kognitiven Einschränkungen von argumentativen Kompetenzen profitieren?
  • 17:00 Pause
  • 17:30–18:45 Gregor Betz (Karlsruhe)
    Argumentlandkarten als Mittel der Urteilsbildung

Mittwoch, 20. September 2023

  • 09:30–10:45 Philipp Richter (Bochum)
    „Mehr als nur Sätze…“. Zur Funktion von Sinnlichkeit und Bildern beim Argumentieren
  • 10:45 Pause
  • 11:15–12:30 Linda Merkel (Potsdam)
    Mit Geschichten argumentieren? – Narrative Texte und ihr Beitrag zur philosophischen Urteilsbildung

Registrierung und weitere Informationen

Alle Interessierten sind herzlich zur Teilnahme eingeladen und werden gebeten, sich bis zum 10. September per E-Mail an donata.romizi@univie.ac.at anzumelden.

Organisation und Dank

Der Workshop wird organisiert von Donata Romizi und David Löwenstein. Für die großzügige Finanzierung des Workshops im Rahmen des Netzwerks „Argumentieren in der Schule“ danken wir der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft, für die Übernahme von Verpflegungskosten der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie.

Job: PhD position (3 years) in the Philosophy of the Life Sciences at Bielefeld University, Germany (deadline: July 5th, 2023)

The Faculty of History, Philosophy und Theology, Department of Philosophy (research group philosophy of science, Prof. Dr. Marie I. Kaiser/Prof. Dr. Lara Keuck/Jun.-Prof. Dr. Alkistis Elliott-Graves), has the following job opening: PhD position in the Philosophy of the Life Sciences

Your tasks

– conduct independent research in the philosophy of the life sciences and in related areas (65 %)- teaching at Bachelor and/or Master level in philosophy and/or in the Master’s program “Interdisciplinary Studies of Science”; 2-3 courses per year, in German or English (25 %)- actively participate in the meetings and events of the philosophy of science group and the Department of Philosophy (5 %)- organizational tasks that are part of the self-administration of the university (5 %)
Employment is conductive to scientific qualification (PhD).
We offer– salary according to Remuneration level 13 TV-L- fixed-term (3 years) (§ 2 (1) sentence 2 of the WissZeitVG; in accordance with the provisions of the WissZeitVG and the Agreement on Satisfactory Conditions of Employment, the length of contract may differ in individual cases)- part-time 65%- internal and external training opportunities- amount of health, consulting and prevention service- reconcilability of family and working life For more information about our expectations, documents required for application and the online form for application please have a look at the following website:

English: https://uni-bielefeld.hr4you.org/job/view/2528/research-position-in-the-philosophy-of-the-life-sciences?page_lang=en

German: https://uni-bielefeld.hr4you.org/job/view/2530/wissenschaftliche-r-mitarbeiter-in-m-w-d-in-der-philosophie-der-lebenswissenschaften?page_lang=de

application deadline: July, 5th, 2023

Contact

Prof. Dr. Marie I. Kaiser

+49-(0)521-106-4605kaiser.m@uni-bielefeld.de

Logik
philosophisch – psychologisch – mathematisch – informatisch

Hintergrund:
In seiner Erkenntnislehre unterscheidet Stumpf zwischen universalen Axiomen oder logischen Grundsätzen einerseits und regionalen Axiomen oder phänomenologischen Grundsätzen andererseits. Das so bestimmte, phänomenologisch geprägte Logikkonzept soll im Mittelpunkt der Jahrestagung stehen und mit anderen, auch aktuellen Logikkonzepten verglichen werden.

Call for papers

Die Carl Stumpf Gesellschaft lädt dazu ein, die Bedeutung der verschiedenen Logikkonzepte für den Erkenntnisprozess im allgemeinen und für die verschiedenen wissenschaftlichen Disziplinen im besonderen aufzuzeigen. Es wird begrüßt, wenn die Beiträge einen Bezug zur Erkenntnislehre von Carl Stumpf aufweisen.

Im Rahmen der Tagung wird Studenten in einer eigenen Sektion die Gelegenheit gebeten, über ihre aktuellen Abschlussarbeiten (Thema beliebig) aus dem Bereich der Systematischen Musikwissenschaften zu berichten.

Die Vorträge können in Deutsch oder Englisch gehalten werden. In begründeten Ausnahmefällen ist auch ein Online-Vortrag möglich.

Interessenten werden gebeten, kurze Abstracts für Vorträge und Präsentationen bis zum 01. Juli 2023 per E-Mail beim Vorstand der CSG einzureichen: martin.ebeling@tu-dortmund.de

The Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy invites abstracts for the following event: 

The Unconventional Memory Workshop

MCMP, LMU Munich

September 12-13, 2023https://www.mcmp.philosophie.uni-muenchen.de/events/workshops/container/memory_workshop_2023/index.html
*********************************************

Recent philosophical and scientific research has aimed to widen the boundaries of what we think memory is as well as where and how we think it occurs. This workshop is dedicated to the implications of research on these “unconventional” cases of memory. These cases include, but are not limited to:

  • Odd memory phenomena (or memory quirks) in humans
  • Memory in non-humans, including other biological and non-biological systems
  • Systems that are conventionally thought to be orthogonal to memory, such as hereditary or immune systems
  • Accounts of memory from research programs like 4E cognition, minimal cognition, basal cognition, or ecological psychology 
  • Non-synaptic explanations of memory phenomena

Call for abstracts

We have space for a small number of talks that fit the topic of unconventional memory. Works that take formal, empirical, historical, and philosophical perspectives on the topic are welcome. Talks that are supportive or critical of unconventional memory are welcome as well, as are talks that address its implications for philosophy of science or cognitive science. 

Please submit an abstract no longer than 1000 words to david.colaco@lmu.de. Please put “Unconventional Memory” in the subject line of your email, list author(s) and affiliation(s) in the body of the email, and include the abstract as an attachment. Please submit by by July 7th, 2023 for consideration. 

Organizer

David Colaço (LMU Munich, Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy)

Guest editors: Tobias Henschen (Cologne), Andreas Hüttemann (Cologne)

Topical Collection Description: The metaphysics of science debate is often characterized as dividing philosophers who endorse positions of “maximal” metaphysics and “maximal” anti-metaphysics: philosophers who believe and philosophers who refuse to believe that the content or practice of science is to be explained in terms of unobservable entities, that these entities exist independently of the content and practice of science, that explanations in terms of these entities are (approximately) true, and that we can come to know that these explanations are true, and the negation of this position. What often remains unnoticed is that the metaphysics of science debate has shifted: that the leading participants in the debate have moved toward more moderate positions – positions that can be referred to as positions of “minimal” metaphysics and “minimal” anti-metaphysics. Like maximal metaphysicians, minimal metaphysicians believe that the content or practice of science is to be explained in terms of unobservable entities (for instance, structure), and that these entities exist independently of the content and practice of science. But unlike maximal metaphysicians, minimal metaphysicians emphasize the fallibility of their positions and restrict their ontological commitments to some minimal set of entities. Like maximal anti-metaphysicians, minimal anti-metaphysicians believe that the content or practice of science is not to be explained in terms of unobservable entities that exist independently of the content or practice of science. But unlike maximal anti-metaphysicians, minimal anti-metaphysicians believe that the content or practice of science is to be explained in terms of phenomenal entities, or that scientific realism about observable entities needs to be extended to “unobservable” entities that (like subatomic particles) can be “observed” by our aided senses. The planned collection is supposed to describe the shift in the metaphysics of science debate by providing a forum for the various positions of minimal (anti-) metaphysics that have been defended more recently, for clarifications or elaborations of these positions, and for the arguments and methods that have been or can be employed in support or against these positions.

Appropriate topics for submission include

  • presentations, clarifications, or elaborations of and
  • arguments for or against

positions of (anti-) metaphysics that qualify as “minimal” in the sense described above, or in a similar sense. These positions include (but are not limited to) variants of

  • ontic structural realism,
  • pragmatism,
  • conventionalism,
  • neo-Kantianism,
  • Super Humeanism

For further information, please contact Tobias Henschen (lead guest editor): tobias.henschen@uni-koeln.de

The deadline for submissions is 31 December 2023.

Submissions via: https://www.editorialmanager.com/synt/default.aspx

Tobias Henschen (tobias.henschen@uni-koeln.de), Andreas Hüttemann (ahuettem@uni-koeln.de)